Increasingly downsizing solder joints in microelectronics devices lead them to withstand more mechanical, electrical and thermodynamic load with their requirement in terms of reliability uprising. Electronics packaging technology including SMT (Surface Mount Technology), CSP (Chip-Scale Package) and BGA (Ball Grid Array) technology need to implement electrical and rigid mechanical connection between different materials through solder joints so that connection quality and reliability determine the quality and reliability of electronic products. Failure of even a single solder joint possibly cause complete breakdown of electronic products. Therefore, how to ensure quality of solder joints is an extremely essential concern for modern electronic products.
Traditional SnPb solder contains Pb (lead) which, together with lead chemical compound, is such a highly toxic substance that their long-term application will bring extreme damage to people's life and environment. Up to now, lead-free solder is constantly replacing lead solder for its merits of environmental protection. However, lead-free manufacturing differs from lead manufacturing in PCBA (Printed Circuit Board Assembly) process with parameters modified. Therefore, it's of much significance to get fully aware of comparison between lead soldering and lead-free soldering manufacturing procedure in PCBA so that electronic products' performance and functions won't be compromised by environmental concern.
a. Melting point of traditional lead eutectic solder (Sn37Pb) is 183°C.
b. Melting point of lead-free eutectic solder (SAC387) is 217°C.
Since lead-free eutectic solder (SAC387) features a 34°C higher melting point than traditional lead eutectic solder (Sn37Pb), the consequence is:
1).The rising temperature afterwards leads solder to be easily oxidized with chemical compound quickly growing between metals.
2).Some components such as those with plastic package or electrolytic capacitors tend to be more affected by soldering temperature than other elements.
3).SAC alloy will bring larger stress to components so that components with low dielectric constant will have more access to failures.
4).Numerous types of soldering surfaces are available on lead-free solder surface of components. Application of tin in solder is more applied due to its low cost. Nevertheless, a thin oxidation layer tends to be generated on the surface of tin. Plus, stress will be possibly made after electroplating. As a result, tin whisker tends to be generated.
Compared with lead solder, lead-free solder features obviously lower wettability than lead solder. Bad wettability tends to make solder joints perform too incapably to meet requirement in terms of self-calibration capability, tensile strength and shear strength. Bad wettability possibly lead to a higher reject ratio of solder joints when modifications aren't implemented to compensate for this disadvantage.
Below table demonstrates physical characteristics difference between lead-free solder and lead solder.
As is depicted in above table, lead-free solder will definitely call for bad influence on solder joint reliability due to solder performance difference compared with traditional lead solder manufacturing. From the perspective of mechanical influence, typical lead-free solder is harder than lead solder. Moreover, generated surface oxide, flux contaminant and alloy residue will possibly lead to bad performances on electrical contact and contact resistance. Thus, electronic products' conversion from lead to lead-free manufacturing is never pure replacement in either electrical or mechanical aspects owing to the following reasons:
a. Because lead is relatively soft, solder joints generated by lead-free manufacturing are harder than those generated by lead manufacturing, leading to higher intensity and smaller transformation, which, however, will definitely lead to high reliability of lead-free solder joints.
b. Because lead-free solder features bad wettability, more defects will be aroused including vacancy, displacement and tomb standing.